Bruce Montague
Bill C-68 Court Challenge
CCF Takes Montague Case | News | Sign-Up for email-updates | donate Donate
Online
This Case Epilogue written February 1, 2017 is intended to provide context to this web site as it documents a Canadian constitutional challenge spanning from 2004 to 2016. Bruce Montague determined to expose the constitutional violations in the Canadian Firearms Act. After being charged, mounting a constitutional challenge and appealing to the Supreme Court of Canada, Montague's case was dismissed without reasons. With Bruce in jail, the Montagues then faced an another twist of injustice -- the confiscation of their home and property by the Ontario government. The Montagues fought the civil forfeiture of their home for years until, in the summer of 2016, the Canadian Constitution Foundation was instrumental in negotiating with the Ontario Civil Forfeiture department to drop the lien against the Montague home. The Canadian Constitution Foundation deserves our support as they continue to fight other cases of injustice around the country. YOU COULD BE NEXT! Canada is undergoing a quiet revolution and your fundamental rights and freedoms are at stake!
What's Wrong with Civil Forfeiture» | Write to Stop Civil Forfeiture»

About
YouTube
News Archive
Testimonials
Rationale
Quotes
Letters
Editorials
Audio/Video
Photos

Volunteer
Donate
Advertise
Write

Donors
Contact
Links
F.A.Q.
Search
Site Map

Oct5: A Challenge to Freedom Loving Canadians

Letters Index

October 5, 2005

Dear Bruce:

After our telephone conversation I must say I was very impressed with the amount of work and effort that you and Donna are doing to challenge Bill C-68.

Please let me tell you a bit about myself. I am 78 years old and still am able to do a fair days work. I have enjoyed many good years of hunting and fishing with my family and friends. I don't hunt animals any more because my wife and I cannot consume all the meat , but that is not the whole problem Bill C-68 takes away. Our rights to own property, our rights to protect our families' property.

Our television station reports the Police as saying if you are invaded, do not attack but give the invaders what they request. Since the liberals have given inmates the rights to vote, it would seem that the next law to be implemented is that the criminal is becoming an endangered species. Anytime a gun is stolen, it is never the culprit who is apprehended, but the gun owner is charged. Where is the logic in that?

Over 90% of my hunting is now done with my camera and not guns any more, but as a concerned citizen I need to see resolution in this.

My main concern is: are you going to get the finances required? I came up with the idea that should not be a problem. If I were to donate $1,000.00, we would only need 299 concerned Canadians to make the same donation or 3000 people at $100.00 each to make this funding happen. This, I'm sure is a small percentage of gun owners who would be more than willing to make the donation.

Please find enclosed a cheque for $1,000 payable to:

"Bruce Montague Scrap C-68 Fund"

Sincerely,
George Schmidt


back to top | search | home | site map
DISCLAIMER: BruceMontague.ca is maintained by friends and supporters of Bruce Montague.
It is NOT an official mouth-piece for Bruce Montague's legal defense.